D1. If ap = e where p is a prime number , then a has order p. ( a e.)
Proof
from
ap = e
o(a) | p
but p is a prime
number and 0 < |G|
hence o(a) = p (because a e)
D2. The order of ak is a divisor ( factor ) of the order of a.
Proof
from
ao(a)
= e
(ao(a))k = ek
= e
ak.o(a) = (ak)
o(a) = e
o(ak) | o(a)
D3. If ord( a ) = km , then ord( ak ) = m.
Proof
e =
akm = (ak)m
o(ak) | m
want to show that m | o(ak)
let x = o(ak)
(ak)x = akx = e
o(a) | kx
from o(a) = km and x = o(ak)
km | k.o(ak)
m | o(ak) o(ak) = m
D4. If ord(a ) = n where n is odd , then ord(a2 ) = n.
Proof
hence
an = e
(an)2 = e2 = e = a2n
= (a2)n o(a2) | n
let m = o(a2)
so (a2)m = e
= a2m
n | 2m
but gcd(n,2) = 1 (because n is odd)
hence n | m o(a2) = n
D5. If a has order n , and ar = as , then n is a factor of r s.
Proof
ar
= as
ar - s = e
hence o(a) | r-s
n | r-s
D6. If a is the only element of order k in G , then a is in the center of G.
Proof
from theorem C4
hence k = o(a) = o(xax-1)
a = xax-1 ( because we have only a is the element of
order k )
ax = xa
a C
D7. If the order of a is not a multiple of m , then the order of ak is not a multiple of m.
Proof
proof with
Contrapositive form
hence o(ak) = mx บาง x Z
want to show that o(a) = my some y Z
from D2 hence o(ak) | o(a)
o(a) = o(ak).n some n Z
= (mx)n = m(xn) = my ( x,n Z xn Z , xn = y)
can write o(a) in mutiple of m form
D8. If ord( a ) = mk and ark = e , then r is a multiple of m.
Proof
from ark
= e o(a) | rk
hence rk = [o(a)]x some x Z
and o(a) = km
rk =
(km)x
r = mx
can write r in multiple of m form